Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom or FF16 - which one are you most interested in?

  • 120 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

41273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Poll Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom or FF16 - which one are you most interested in? (74 votes)

Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom 65%
Final Fantasy 16 34%

This week we got the final trailers/showcases for each game. At this point fans should have a good idea of what to expect. I will definitely be getting both. Breath of the Wild brought Zelda into a new era while also being a trendsetter. The sequel will no doubt improve on the game to keep us entertained. It does get flack for looking more like Breath of the Wild 2 than it’s own game lol, but if it’s like a Majora’s Mask type sequel, I’m down! As for FF16, I’ll admit, this game wasn’t very high on my hype meter that long ago. I was may more excited for Final Fantasy 7 Remake Part 2. But now I’m a believer. Game looks absolutely fantastic. Find it funny that Max called it a Japanese Witcher. It does have some of that vibe, aesthetically, but it will be a much better game, gameplay wise.

So which one am I most interested in? I would’ve said Tears of the Kingdom last week, but I’m switching my answer to FF16. It’s got the shiny new thing going for it. How about you, SW? Tears of the Kingdom or FF16 - which one are you most interested in?

 • 
Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

63301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#101  Edited By Pedro
Member since 2002 • 63301 Posts
@gifford38 said:

im not a victim but our children are. my 6 year old son ask me the other day if he suppose to be gay because he is white because his class mates told him that.

kids are confused today. it needs to stop.

luke skywalker could not be allowed to teach ray the force because of the modern audience.

im no victim im just stating what is happening in hollywood.

Are you seriously trying to claim that your son was considered gay because he was white?😂

You play the victim card in your last comment and now you are retracting from it while pushing more nonsense. Well, at least that is progress.🤷🏽

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

17835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#102 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 17835 Posts
@Pedro said:

What about Fang?

FFXIV races? Are you seriously trying to pass that off as equivalency to the human race? Did you understand the conversation before jumping in? You inadvertently demonstrated my point while trying to prove the contrary.

It is interesting that you decided to pick on a game in which there is no character customization from the West to compare. If you want something comparable I provided Guild Wars 2. Just so you know, The Witcher 3 was called out on its lack of diversity. Not sure why you are using whataboutism. It doesn't make the criticism less valid just deflects. Claiming that WRPGs are far less diverse than JRPGs is absolutely comical it is beyond bizarre that you actually believe that falsehood.

Fang is a brown woman wearing a saree. Go figure.

Even most of the humans look brown in those FFXIV pictures, let alone the non-human races. Your point is baseless.

Mainline FF games also lack character customization, just like The Witcher games. So it's an apt comparison. The most famous FF game, FFVII, has a fairly diverse cast of main characters (Asian, black, white). The most famous Witcher game, TW3, has a cast of exclusively white main characters. And yes, WRPGs have historically been far less diverse than JRPGs. But then again, it's been years since I've last played a WRPG, so not sure if the genre has improved in that regard.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

63301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#103 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 63301 Posts
@st_monica said:

1. Oh, I didn't know you played that infamous early version. If so, it's no wonder you have a bad impression of the game, haha. The fact is, as I mentioned earlier, the characters have become more and more diverse over the years. But if they still look the same to you, there is nothing more to say. Also, I'm not very familiar with GW2. How good does it get at representing culture?

2. Well, the reason I called your argument “juvenile” is because you so hypocritically use what you call a "historically problematic" issue as a tool to criticize the FF series, which is completely unrelated. I’ll explain how you miss the point in the following discussion as responding to your arguments.

As for Elvis, of course I understand the history of "whitewashing" the rock music genre that has its origins in black music. But in all seriousness, are you really so stupid as to extend this problem to the naming of summons and monsters in the FF series as well?

3. The reason I mentioned "cultural appropriation" is because even though you don't use the term, you argue in that vein, though your argument is an even more poorly interpreted version. And you have not been able to answer what harm the FF series has done to anyone specifically and in what way, nor have you been able to provide any evidence of such harm.

4. The reason I dare to say "whitish" is that white-skinned FF series characters should not necessarily be equated with actual "whites" in the real world. They are not actual representations of Englishmen, Frenchmen, or Germans who share the culture and history of their respective countries, but fictional characters from a fantasy medieval Europe imagined by their Japanese creators. For example, Cloud of FF7 is indeed white-skinned, but he does not have the same cultural or historical background as a real-life white person. The same is basically true for other white-skinned characters. That's why I used the word "whitish" in context in response to your wild attempt to equate the two.

5. If you say it is not exploitation, then fine. I only showed the number of Hindus to show that it is not.

6. Also, as with the "whitish" characters, the summons in the FF series are not necessarily the same as the actual gods. For example, FF's "Shiva" is not a copy of the actual Indian mythological god of destruction, "Siva." Though its name may allude to "Siva", it was completely reimagined as a Summon with the attribute of ice power (perhaps a play on the English word "shiver"), and its design is completely different.

Also, Hinduism does not exist in the FF world, so of course such religious references are not included in the lore at all. It should be called a parody or reference, not a misrepresentation. Again, tell me specifically how Hindus were harmed by this.

7. The ancient myths can generally be considered as the historical heritage of mankind as a whole. Of course, they certainly belong to each culture in their origin. But there is no rule that says that one should not freely refer to them, except for exploitative purposes, as I just explained with the Native American example of "cultural appropriation".

But let's be specific here. Actually, there are not many references to African culutres in the FF series. Ninki Nanka and Kongomato, which you mentioned, are among the few examples. They are certainly believed to be imaginary creatures in parts of Africa. However, they are not objects of belief, nor do they have any significant cultural background.

Again, what harm is done to the natives of Africa by using their names for monsters in FF games? Who in Africa is complaining anyway? Tell me the specific "harm", not abstract arguments like "because white people used to exploit them, blah-blah-blah".

8. Well, indeed, as you have so desperately tried to explain, the deprivation of Africa and Asia was done by Westerners. Yes, they colonized many of these countries and committed terrible depredations against their people, resources, and cultures. No one denies that.

But again, we should not equate the naming of monsters in FF with the completely unrelated evil of the cultural plundering of Africa and Asia by Westerners. The former is just a harmless video game; the latter is a major historical crime with real damage and victims.

Btw, speaking of Africa, do you know why there are as many as 54 countries? It is mainly the result of the arbitrary division and governance by Western colonizers in the 19th and early 20th centuries. There were never that many countries in Africa to begin with. I say this because you seem to be using "54 countries" as if it were a number that represents the cultural diversity of Africa without being aware of it.

Back to the topic and the "misrepresentation of culture" thing, do you really think that there are idiots in this world who think that just because they are summoned by a "white man" in a video game that the summoned beast is from the west? Or that there are enemies named after African mythology without reference that appear in a video game and think they belong to another culture? Why don't you just admit that you're just making up false "harms" to attack the FF series that you don't like?

9. Well, I gave that example about black music to show the emptiness of your argument. In fact you can't even answer that simple question properly because you know you are talking nonsense.

10. Well, let's face it, Pedro. This is what happened. You were desperately looking for material to criticize the FF series for whatever reason. You found an argument somewhere on the Internet that white people in this game summon or fight gods and monsters from non-Western mythology, and that their origins are not mentioned.

You, or the forum where you found it, probably thought you could use this to problematize the game as having content that affirms the white man's dispossession of other cultures. So you desperately talk about the exploitation of Africa/Asia by the West.

11. But let's be real, this has nothing to do with the FF series directly, and you yourself know very well that neither Indians nor Africans are complaining about this game, because the only ones complaining are you and some FF haters who made up the problem themselves.

12. How juvenile and hypocritical.

I love the "calm down" strategy, it is so textbook for folks like you to use it.😎

Again, you should calm down, Pedro, haha.

1. So, you made a false assumption and now you are making another false assumption with my experience with the game. 🤔I gave you a reference, you are free to take the time to validate it. I am not doing your homework.

2. So juvenile is hypocritical? You are aware that those two words are not related. Now you are claiming using historically problematic behavior is hypocritical all because you are unable to handle criticism of a game that has routinely used other cultures without representation of the people from said cultures. Demonstrating the harm of using other groups' cultures without representation is stupid because I refer to something that is more common to you. So, instead of understanding the context and the reference in relation to the conversation you draw a nonsensical conclusion.🤷🏽‍♂️

3. In order to misuse a term, the term needs to be used. Super simple concept. Please note the difference.

4. Translation "Despite the characters being blatantly white, I would come up with the most asinine logic to detract from the fact that they are white by redefining the idea. "

5. Admitting your error. 👍🏽

6. Intentional missing the point to defend the game's use of cultures without representing the people of said culture.

7. You keep asking what harm is done by directly taking ideas from other cultures and not representing the people. This has been noted in my very first comment to you.

"The harm it causes is that it makes an association of multi-cultural ideas to a specific group of people, perpetuating ideas that are already false and problematic."

8. You continue to parade ignorance/intentionally misrepresent human behavior and trivialize the influence of media on society. People are exposed to ideas in books, film, imagery, music, video games, and oral communication. What is pushed in these interactions has a direct impact on the population's perception of specific groups. It is a well-documented part of human history and interaction. You are attempting to undermine this fact with falsehood. It is clear that you don't appreciate the criticism because, like most people who are unable to detach themselves from the content they like, you take the criticism against the game as a direct attack on you. This is why this is less of an objective discussion of the product and more of an emotional defense of yourself. Which you will obviously deny.

9. You just used a nonsensical example. Don't worry it is a common strategy in disingenuous discussions.

10. More assusmptions. I teach world mythology, I am knowledgeable of human history and the cause-and-effect cultural exchanges. It is clear that you are projecting the methods by which you acquire ideas or draw conclusions. Me pointing out the issues I have with the game was viewed as a direct attack on you because you have a strong emotional connection with the game. This is the reason you feel obligated to defend it with a barrage of ill-thought counterarguments and assumptions.

11. What makes you believe that statement is true? What is more interesting is that you directly undermined the statement by saying even if it is true, they are just haters.

12. Finally you know that these words are different.

"There is not much that can be discussed if you are not versed on the topic. Feel free to fall back on silly deflections and poorly thought-out counters. 🤷🏽‍♀️"

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

63301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#104 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 63301 Posts

@Jag85 said:
@Pedro said:

What about Fang?

FFXIV races? Are you seriously trying to pass that off as equivalency to the human race? Did you understand the conversation before jumping in? You inadvertently demonstrated my point while trying to prove the contrary.

It is interesting that you decided to pick on a game in which there is no character customization from the West to compare. If you want something comparable I provided Guild Wars 2. Just so you know, The Witcher 3 was called out on its lack of diversity. Not sure why you are using whataboutism. It doesn't make the criticism less valid just deflects. Claiming that WRPGs are far less diverse than JRPGs is absolutely comical it is beyond bizarre that you actually believe that falsehood.

Fang is a brown woman wearing a saree. Go figure.

Even most of the humans look brown in those FFXIV pictures, let alone the non-human races. Your point is baseless.

Mainline FF games also lack character customization, just like The Witcher games. So it's an apt comparison. The most famous FF game, FFVII, has a fairly diverse cast of main characters (Asian, black, white). The most famous Witcher game, TW3, has a cast of exclusively white main characters. And yes, WRPGs have historically been far less diverse than JRPGs. But then again, it's been years since I've last played a WRPG, so not sure if the genre has improved in that regard.

Brown?😂 For a white person she is "brown". I suggest you look up the spectrum of human color.

My point is not baseless because you have fictional races in a game. Feel free to refer to the comment you were responding to for context. It would help in your next "counter" argument.

No, it is not an app comparison since you were comparing an MMO to a single-player game with no character customization (please don't try the skills customization argument). You also void your entire argument with

"But then again, it's been years since I've last played a WRPG, so not sure if the genre has improved in that regard."

Be better next time.😌

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

17835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#105  Edited By Jag85
Member since 2005 • 17835 Posts

@Pedro:

I suggest you look up what Indian women look like. Many Indian women have the same shade of brown as Fang, and many are even lighter (especially Bollywood actresses). And she's clearly wearing a saree... Again, go look that up, if you don't know what that is. She's clearly intended to represent an Indian woman, debunking your claim about people from Hindu culture never being represented in FF.

Out of the humans in those FFXIV screenshots, at least half of them look brown, debunking your claim about no non-white humans in FFXIV... Serious question: Do all brown and Asian people look "white" to you? You do realize that black and white aren't the only human skin tones in this world, right?

I just compared FFVII to TW3, both the most famous games from their respective genres. Out of the two, FFVII is far more diverse than TW3. That's not even debatable.

The last WRPGs I've played are The Witcher games. If there are WRPGs since then that are more diverse, feel free to let me know. But that doesn't negate my point. If we're talking all of RPG history, then WRPGs have been way less diverse than JRPGs.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

63301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#106 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 63301 Posts

@Jag85 said:

@Pedro:

I suggest you look up what Indian women look like. Many Indian women have the same shade of brown as Fang, and many are even lighter (especially Bollywood actresses). And she's clearly wearing a saree... Again, go look that up, if you don't know what that is. She's clearly intended to represent an Indian woman, debunking your claim about people from Hindu culture never being represented in FF.

Out of the humans in those FFXIV screenshots, at least half of them look brown, debunking your claim about no non-white humans in FFXIV... Serious question: Do all brown and Asian people look "white" to you? You do realize that black and white aren't the only human skin tones in this world, right?

I just compared FFVII to TW3, both the most famous games from their respective genres. Out of the two, FFVII is far more diverse than TW3. That's not even debatable.

The last WRPGs I've played are The Witcher games. If there are WRPGs since then that are more diverse, feel free to let me know. But that doesn't negate my point. If we're talking all of RPG history, then WRPGs have been way less diverse than JRPGs.

Well this is interesting. Here is a factoid. I am 45% Indian, 50% of my family is Indian. Now you are trying to educate me on what Indian people look like?🤭 Let me take wild guess that you are a white man from the US. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong. The fact that you use Bollywood as a reference further demonstrates that you really don't know what you are talking about. Feel free to educate yourself on India and skin bleaching in addition to the history behind such practices. It may help with understanding.

There only two humans in that screenshot per gender generated from a character creator. You know, the feature that allows you to pick and choose what you character looks like. That is your proof. User made characters. And you follow up that with trying to educate a multiracial person about skin tones.🤣 The silliness.

We went from FFXIV to FFVII but the western game of reference remains the same. Interesting that you decided not to include RPGs like FallOut, Outer Worlds, Mass Effect.🤔

I suggest that you are avoid making statements that is based on ignorance.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

22025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107  Edited By Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 22025 Posts

Here is one of the major characters in FF14. Probably the most important character that isn't a scion.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

63301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#108  Edited By Pedro
Member since 2002 • 63301 Posts

@Maroxad: Raubahn 👍🏽 The one that has a thing for the lalafel,

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

17835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#109  Edited By Jag85
Member since 2005 • 17835 Posts
@Pedro said:

Well this is interesting. Here is a factoid. I am 45% Indian, 50% of my family is Indian. Now you are trying to educate me on what Indian people look like?🤭 Let me take wild guess that you are a white man from the US. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong. The fact that you use Bollywood as a reference further demonstrates that you really don't know what you are talking about. Feel free to educate yourself on India and skin bleaching in addition to the history behind such practices. It may help with understanding.

There only two humans in that screenshot per gender generated from a character creator. You know, the feature that allows you to pick and choose what you character looks like. That is your proof. User made characters. And you follow up that with trying to educate a multiracial person about skin tones.🤣 The silliness.

We went from FFXIV to FFVII but the western game of reference remains the same. Interesting that you decided not to include RPGs like FallOut, Outer Worlds, Mass Effect.🤔

I suggest that you are avoid making statements that is based on ignorance.

Interesting. I assumed you were a white man from the US, so must be ignorant about Indian culture. But no, I'm not a white man from the US either. I'm from the UK, and ethnically somewhat similar to you. So I'm more than familiar with Indian culture. But the issue you're talking about is colourism, which you're conflating with racism.

If you know you can select the skin colour in FFXIV, then why were you claiming all the humans are white?

Because Final Fantasy and Witcher are the most famous games in their respective genres. But sure, I'll give you Mass Effect, though that's an exception. As for Fallout, the player character is user-generated, so doesn't count if FFXIV user-generated characters don't count either.

Your statements about the FF series sound pretty ignorant to me. I'm guessing you've only played like one or two FF games?

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

63301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#110 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 63301 Posts

@Jag85 said:

Interesting. I assumed you were a white man from the US, so must be ignorant about Indian culture. But no, I'm not a white man from the US either. I'm from the UK, and ethnically somewhat similar to you. So I'm more than familiar with Indian culture. But the issue you're talking about is colourism, which you're conflating with racism.

If you know you can select the skin colour in FFXIV, then why were you claiming all the humans are white?

Because Final Fantasy and Witcher are the most famous games in their respective genres. But sure, I'll give you Mass Effect, though that's an exception. As for Fallout, the player character is user-generated, so doesn't count if FFXIV user-generated characters don't count either.

Your statements about the FF series sound pretty ignorant to me. I'm guessing you've only played like one or two FF games?

Never mentioned anything about race. That is something you introduced.

Never stated that ALL HUMANS are white in FFXIV. Another thing you introduced.

Are you understanding the discussion? Diversity in the focal characters. I didn't pick games based on whether you can customize your characters but the core cast.

That is incorrect.🙃

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

14265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#111  Edited By texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 14265 Posts
@Jag85 said:

@Pedro:

I suggest you look up what Indian women look like. Many Indian women have the same shade of brown as Fang, and many are even lighter (especially Bollywood actresses). And she's clearly wearing a saree... Again, go look that up, if you don't know what that is. She's clearly intended to represent an Indian woman, debunking your claim about people from Hindu culture never being represented in FF.

Out of the humans in those FFXIV screenshots, at least half of them look brown, debunking your claim about no non-white humans in FFXIV... Serious question: Do all brown and Asian people look "white" to you? You do realize that black and white aren't the only human skin tones in this world, right?

I just compared FFVII to TW3, both the most famous games from their respective genres. Out of the two, FFVII is far more diverse than TW3. That's not even debatable.

The last WRPGs I've played are The Witcher games. If there are WRPGs since then that are more diverse, feel free to let me know. But that doesn't negate my point. If we're talking all of RPG history, then WRPGs have been way less diverse than JRPGs.

Disco Elysium. Fallout. Elder's Scrolls, Mass Effect, Cyberpunk 2077, Dragon Age all were diverse in its human cast.

Western RPGs are FAR more diverse in their casts than JRPGs and its not even close.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

17835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#112  Edited By Jag85
Member since 2005 • 17835 Posts
@Pedro said:

Never mentioned anything about race. That is something you introduced.

Never stated that ALL HUMANS are white in FFXIV. Another thing you introduced.

Are you understanding the discussion? Diversity in the focal characters. I didn't pick games based on whether you can customize your characters but the core cast.

That is incorrect.

Bruv, you were talking about race this whole time before I entered the debate.

It sure sounds like you did claim such a thing:

@Pedro said:

They are not whitish, they are straight up white despite origins not being white.

Then what exactly do you mean by "diverse" if not skin colour?

@Pedro said:

@st_monica: Final Fantasy XIV focal characters all look like carbon copies of each other. Lets not pretend that he has a history of creating diverse characters or that JPRG "fantasy" games are known for being diverse.

What FF games have you played?

Avatar image for dabear
dabear

7202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#113 dabear
Member since 2002 • 7202 Posts

@SolidGame_basic: So... now you have a Switch, too?

Bro, you are the worst fake manticore in the history of System Wars.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

17835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#114 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 17835 Posts
@texasgoldrush said:

Disco Elysium. Fallout. Elder's Scrolls, Mass Effect, Cyberpunk 2077, Dragon Age all were diverse in its human cast.

Western RPGs are FAR more diverse in their casts than JRPGs and its not even close.

In the last decade or so, there has been more of a push for diversity in WRPGs. But there was very little diversity in WRPGs prior to that. If you compare older WRPGs with older JRPGs, then the WRPGs were far less diverse than the JRPGs.

And you still haven't addressed my point about Witcher. The same people attacking FFXVI and Kingdom Come Deliverence never had the same heat for Witcher.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

63301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#115 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 63301 Posts

@Jag85 said:
@Pedro said:

Never mentioned anything about race. That is something you introduced.

Never stated that ALL HUMANS are white in FFXIV. Another thing you introduced.

Are you understanding the discussion? Diversity in the focal characters. I didn't pick games based on whether you can customize your characters but the core cast.

That is incorrect.

Bruv, you were talking about race this whole time before I entered the debate.

It sure sounds like you did claim such a thing:

@Pedro said:

They are not whitish, they are straight up white despite origins not being white.

Then what exactly do you mean by "diverse" if not skin colour?

@Pedro said:

@st_monica: Final Fantasy XIV focal characters all look like carbon copies of each other. Lets not pretend that he has a history of creating diverse characters or that JPRG "fantasy" games are known for being diverse.

What FF games have you played?

Please point to a statement in which I stated that all FF characters were white. After all you want to double down that claim.

Diverse is simply representing the different cultures with the people associated with said cultures and not associating it with one look an feel of people.

What is relevance of this question the topic at hand and the reference comment?

Avatar image for onesiphorus
onesiphorus

4941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#116 onesiphorus
Member since 2014 • 4941 Posts

Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom. I had enough of turn-based JRPGs like Final Fantasy 16 and prefer real-time battles that are not based on stats or percentages.

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

41273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 SolidGame_basic
Member since 2003 • 41273 Posts

@onesiphorus: but FF16 is not turned based tho?

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

22910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 22910 Posts
@SolidGame_basic said:

@onesiphorus: but FF16 is not turned based tho?

lol yeah.

Also, ironically, while the stats may be much more abstracted, stats were a thing in BotW. Your weapons, your gear, buffs in the form of foods and elixirs. Enemy and weapon scaling occurring with each Divine Beast cleared.

Lots of stuff either heavily abstracted or under the hood.

Obviously a big difference in how these types of games present these things, how conscious the player will be of them. But it's there in BotW nonetheless and there will be a more noticeable spread in TotK with how enemy sub-types are handled.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

14265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#119 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 14265 Posts

@Jag85 said:
@texasgoldrush said:

Disco Elysium. Fallout. Elder's Scrolls, Mass Effect, Cyberpunk 2077, Dragon Age all were diverse in its human cast.

Western RPGs are FAR more diverse in their casts than JRPGs and its not even close.

In the last decade or so, there has been more of a push for diversity in WRPGs. But there was very little diversity in WRPGs prior to that. If you compare older WRPGs with older JRPGs, then the WRPGs were far less diverse than the JRPGs.

And you still haven't addressed my point about Witcher. The same people attacking FFXVI and Kingdom Come Deliverence never had the same heat for Witcher.

First off, The Witcher 3 did have the Olferi in Hearts of Stone.

And no, Fallout, Elder Scrolls, Deus Ex....etc......have always been diverse. And that is far longer than just a decade.

Avatar image for pelvist
pelvist

8896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#120 pelvist
Member since 2010 • 8896 Posts

Zelda by a country mile.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

17835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#121  Edited By Jag85
Member since 2005 • 17835 Posts

@texasgoldrush:

This is what the overwhelming majority of Western AAA protagonists looked like a decade ago, to the point that it was basically a meme:

...All white dudes. How very diverse.

This is where the complaints about lack of diversity in video games came from. Which led to a big push for more diverse protagonists in the last decade or so. Rightfully so.

But in some cases, that push for diversity just doesn't make any logical sense, like the demands for POCs in Medieval Europe settings. Sure, there was some non-white presence in Medieval Europe, but they weren't even 1% of the population in most of Medieval Europe, except for a few regions under Arabic/Turkish/Mongol rule. The backlash towards Kingdom Come Deliverence was way overblown, and the same goes for the backlash towards FFXVI. It's really not such a big deal if there aren't POCs present in a Medieval Europe setting. It's also funny how the same people bashing KCD and FFXVI had no smoke for Witcher... almost like they make exceptions for their favourite games.